TBD
To Win
N. D. Ionel
To Win
Nicholas David Ionel vs Daniil Sarksian Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
L W L W L L L W W LHead To Head: Ionel 1 - 0 Sarksian
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ionel winning 2 and Sarksian winning 0. The last match between Ionel and Sarksian was at the M15 Tsaghkadzor, 26-10-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Nicholas David Ionel getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicholas David Ionel | 1 |
| Daniil Sarksian | 0 |
M15 Tsaghkadzor(26-10-2024)
7
5
6
3
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Ionel
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
Sarksian VS TBD
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniil Sarksian
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:41:0 | Average Match Time | 1:41:0 |
| 73% (41/56) | 1st Serve % | 62% (47/76) |
| 78% (32/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (29/47) |
| 27% (4/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 50% (38/76) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicholas David Ionel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Andrey Chepelev
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Tim Handel
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alex Martinez
88%
(
75 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
82%
(
56 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Florian Broska
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alessandro Bellifemine
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Arthur Nagel
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
55
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Sarksian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Kopeikin
Player
Daniil Sarksian
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Daniil Sarksian
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Sarksian
Player
Dev Javia
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Koray Kirci
Player
Daniil Sarksian
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-7(6) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Sarksian
Player
Suk Hyun Choo
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Daniil Sarksian
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (309/177) | Win/Loss | 46% (16/19) |
| 61% (672/437) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (37/45) |
| 54% (5495/4669) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (393/431) |
| 64% (54/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) |
| 65% (254/139) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) |
| 14% (1/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 574 | Aces Total | 68 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1000 | Total Double Faults | 99 |
| 1:42:42 | Average Match Time | 1:16:9 |
| 470.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.91 |
| 67% (20480/30360) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1074/1858) |
| 63% (12979/20480) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (702/1074) |
| 50% (4915/9880) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (353/784) |
| 48% (1771/3677) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (71/179) |
| 44% (13680/30914) | Return Points Win % | 39% (723/1835) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (52/61) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 71% (254/103) | Futures W/L | 47% (16/18) |
| 63% (305/481) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (61/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 59% (84/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 89% (304/270) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (16/13) |
| 11% (304/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (16/3) |
| 21% (180/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (19/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
